A Summary

A shocking discovery that child sexual exploitation and sexual grooming is being promoted and condoned by countries’ child welfare systems and Family Court. This specific case occurred in one of the richest countries in the world Luxembourg. A Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde social system caters for a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde man, who says that he is said to prefer little boys  and for decades after verbally and unabashedly advertises himself while he pretends to be a victim. While indoctrinating and conning people into thinking he is a kind, generous, honest, decent, hardworking, respectable and morally upstanding person, who pilots the elite’s aircrafts. Those who experience his disrespectful, argumentative, aggressive, stressed, dishonest, morally decrepit Mr. Hyde personality he calls “liars” while piloting aircraft asleep.  Dr. Jekyll cons a woman from his native country into marriage. They have three children. While this man, also a foreigner in this country, initiates and gradually increases his psychological, emotional and gaslight abuse with severe coercive control, including financial abuse to cause stress, destroy and eliminate the mother of the children. He calls people who believe him stupid and himself shit, laughingly saying, “nothing happens to shit, but everything shit touches it ruins”.

Once more he advertises to be called a pedophile. This time saying his wife’s mother is the source of his “victimisation”. Concerned, his wife starts to educate the children that no-one is allowed to touch their privates and that they are not allowed to touch anyone else’s. The mother tells her children that adults who do such things are very sick in their heads. The children, boys, are ages 1, 3 and 4 years old, do not fluently speak the languages of the “respected” country and, because of this, are more vulnerable. This man is upset that his wife starts to educate the children and is seriously questioning him about his behaviour towards the children. Which includes wrestling games where he continuously restrains the little boys and gropes and pinches them in their private areas. He had previously on several occasions told his wife, when being asked to stop it, that there is “something wrong with her (insinuating mentally) for not liking to grab little boys’ penises and buttocks”.
About 5 months, March 2012, after this father’s latest “pedophile” advertisements, the two eldest children told their mother that their father “makes ‘food’ from his penis for them”. The eldest child said “his father puts the ‘food’ in his mouth”. The middle child said “his father puts the ‘food’ in his buttocks.” The mother approaches a child welfare organisations with this information. They refuse to interview the children. There is a cursory medical examination of the eldest and youngest children, but the doctor refuses to examine the child who said his father puts the ‘food’ in his buttocks, because the child is “difficult” to examine – and that accommodates no evidence. (French medical certificate; English translation) The doctor refers the mother to a child psychologist. The mother approached the police. But the police only conference room interview the eldest child, then age 5 years old, who denies his sex abuse while pulling a disgusted face – or so the mother is told by them. The 3 year old child, who was ignored by the doctor, is ignored again. This time the Child Protection Police adamantly refuse to even interview him, occupies themselves with rodents and repeatedly asks, “where is the hamster?” At home the children start to disclose more horrifying details to their mother: Some of their father’s family members, when on holiday in their native country, behave the same as their father. That in Luxembourg they are taken by their father to a group who behaves the same as he does. That he lies to the mother about their whereabouts when this happens. The children call the place “the zoo”, saying the people sing, they call the people there “animals” saying “they bite” and indicated sexual orgies. They relayed how their father is upfront, busy with his bad things, while he leaves them alone amongst the people – men, women and other children. The eldest says “pictures are taken of him there”. There are “bedrooms with dirty bedding”. They name neighbours and friends of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde who are “there”. The police, specifically officers Gildinger and Heinz,  refuses to take any of this information. Later a child psychologist, Dr Schilling, refuses the mother’s request to have her foreign language speaking children evaluated for sexualisation. But the same psychologist concludes in about 20 minutes from observation that the 3 year old foreign language speaking child is not autistic and that the foreign language speaking mother suffers from “mental illness”. This is reported via  a the social service worker/child psychologist Maryse Hansen in a report in the form of 3rd party hearsay to a court.

The “respected” country’s social service system, with support and collaboration of this father, starts disinformation protocol procedures against the mother of the children. Saying, “she is mentally unstable, delirium, delusional, major depressive, anti-social, bi-polar, violent and dangerous etc.” She has lost touch with reality”, they say: “Her children’s toys are on the carpet – because of this the house is chaotic. She has bundles of washing with 3 small children says a barren Ms Maryse Hansen. She allowed her children to take their pet hamster with them to the police – so she endangers her children and sets no boundaries. “O where might she take the goldfish?” she asks.  She allows her children to climb trees.” This is very dangerous, abnormal and unnatural is the impression. “She heals her children with homeopathic medication. This is medical neglect. She neglects her children’s (ages 2,3 and 5 years old) school education, having kept them out of school for a day.” “The teacher don’t like her weight or how she smells”.

This “prefer little boys” father says “he fears from his wife”. She reports child molestation and a group of people he takes the children to. “She  massacred a pizza into a thousand pieces. This is partner violence”, reports Maryse Hansen.
The child molestation is dismissed. A conclusion from a negligent investigation, says “no evidence” by the prosecutor Bob Piron. No charges are made against this father and it is strongly insinuated that he is the victim. The mother is accused of abuse of children, just gossip with no rational evidence in existence, no possible criminal charges can be made. But pedophile supporter Dr Richard Gardner’s “parental alienation of children” procedures are started against her – because authorities “fear for children’s welfare from her”.

Within the month after reporting incestuous homosexual child abuse to police, this Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde files for a divorce with a string of pettiness, clear manipulation and lies and in a 20min court session, one month after, immediately given full temporary custody of the children. The mother is given no rights at all, are told she is mentally unstable and is thrown out of the house at midnight into an apartment above the house. She and her children’s torture commences. This “prefer little boys” father’s brother came to the respected country especially for the purpose of helping his brother kick start the control and restrain of the small children ages 2, 3 and 5-years-old from their mother. The “dangerous, mentally unstable, major depressive” mother is only allowed to watch her children from an upstairs apartment window and listen to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde tell her children that she is very, very sick so they cannot go to her. (Remember: The mother was teaching her children the no touch rules and saying that adults who do these things are very sick in their heads.)
This father wants to get rid of his wife and buys her a ticket back to their native country. The mother approaches that High court to have her children’s welfare assessed and evaluated by a professional capable of speaking the children’s language – in the best interest of the children. The mother is immediately attacked from Luxembourg, because no child should be assessed for sexualisation it is “bad for children”. A half completed and manipulated “pending” Hague application for kidnapping and Emails Luxembourg General Advocate Serge Wagner cens calling the mother “a practicing witch and satanist and/or mentally unstable” are sent out for defaming the mother’s character. Dr. Jekyll and Mr.Hyde and his advocate Anneke du Toit demanded in court and later in media that the mother be found guilty of kidnapping, even though her children is in the father’s care on his parent’s farm. Lies are created for false court impressions surrounding Luxembourg’s behaviour towards the children. One lie being: The children speak all the respected country’s languages and were understood by everyone. Another lie was: The children were interviewed, even received play therapy and evaluated by Luxembourg’s social services, that Maryse Hansen, and there is no need to intervene. Our native country’s court orders a language evaluation of the children which determines that the children can speak only their native language fluently. With that information the judge orders the children back to Luxembourg where no native language professionals exist.

Then this father drives over his middle child who is now 4 years old, breaking his leg and causing a haemorrhaged arm  (arm X ray).The police in the native country decides they want to interview this child for molestation. As a result this father takes the children and flees the native country’s jurisdiction into a neighbouring country. A month later, after removing the evidence (plaster of paris), of having driven over a child, he returns with the children to Luxembourg.

The mother also returns to the apartment she was thrown into in Luxembourg and is again immediately attacked. She is told she has no rights to her children at all. She tries to greet and speak to her children, who reside beneath her apartment, from the window and is harassed and recorded by strangers who are now nannies to her children. They push the children around, ordering them to ignore their mother. One year later Luxembourg’s (the “respected” country) Youth Court judge finally ordains some contact between the mother and her children, supervised and at a section of the criminal institution. Two hours every two weeks she is allowed to meet her children.

All this father’s bad behaviour that is recognised is written off to “accidents” and “poor man he is adjusting to being a father after 5 years”, having had virtually nothing to do with the children’s former care giving. Nannies are hired on a whim, not interviewed before being “employed”, even ones who do not speak the children’s language – Russian, German, Italian, English etc. They are left in their care for more than a month at a time.

This father continues his “victim” act, adding “my wife is mentally unstable, violent and dangerous” – spreading this even to the parents at the children’s school. He wants to get rid of this breeder woman. He instructs nannies to constantly record and report her to police for everything and anything – even making up lies.

The respected country refuse to renew the mother’s family residence permit, stating she does not qualify for one any longer. Eight months later she is given a letter (French; English translation) stating she has 30 days to leave the respected country or be removed with coercion. She ignores this letter and informs the Youth Court judge that she will not be forced to commit the crime of abandoning her children.

During supervised visitations with her children the children tell their mother about their abuse. How they are punished and beaten for speaking to her at the house they basically all share and live in. Physical punishments like pulling/twisting their ears, being constantly slapped on the head, being kicked and other emotional and physical abuse are relayed by the children. The children also talk about performing incest on each other. But talking to the police the children deny any physical abuse. They told their mother their father tells them to speak the truth, but he also says that when they do this, they will have to move to another house. The concept of “another house” became “an orphanage” as the children got older.
The Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde father and his nannies refuse telephonic contact between the mother and children. Using her desire for contact with her children he tries to bargain with the mother that if she stops greeting her children from a window, basically ignoring her children, then he will allow her one call a week. Then on another insane brainwave he says he’ll agree to telephonic contact if the mother gives a   2 day notification to him via advocates.

The mother has had three substantial psychiatric evaluations. All indicate no psychiatric deviations. The court contracted their psychiatrist, Dr Mark Gleis, who diagnosed the mother of the children with “delusional psychosis for fearing for her children’s welfare from the guy who says he is called a pedophile”. Luxembourg’s court and social service employees continuously tell the mother she must remember that she is mentally unstable, that her concern for the welfare of her children is not real and they don’t have to listen. Saying they reserve that right off fearing for her children’s welfare from her. Children for whom they need to look in a document to remember their names.

The mother discovers naked posing pictures of her children on their toy camera. The camera was a present she gave them, which the children had given back about 2 years later to her after saying it is broken. She verbally reports the discovery of the pictures to the Youth Court where she is told by the General Advocate  that the respected country has “future evidence against her that she is a harm to her children”. But the judge changes the mother’s visitations with her children from the criminal institution to her apartment, “to be supervised by a nurse or someone like that.” An extremely unique and vague order.
The mother is left to arrange these visitations with the man who wants to destroy her and get rid of her. He and his supporters start by ignoring emails for visitations for months. She reports him to police. True to form he makes his own rules/orders, demanding interviews with the supervising persons the mother obtains to help her. Social service workers insist he is in “control” and the mother must “respect him”. “He is worried about the children’s welfare”, social service workers insist. He demands from a child psychologist, put forward for supervising visitations, that she must agree not to report on anything the children might tell her during the visitations – this is done in-front of child “welfare” workers. She refuses saying it is against her ethics and withdraws her offer of help.

The children are enrolled into voluntary nature trips on days arranged for visitations. This father arranges everything he possibly can on a date arranged for a visitation and then orders the school social service worker to relay to the mother that the visitation cannot take place anymore on short notice. This is done frequently. This father continues making more and more demands and rules, i.e. “you want to see your children now go pick them up next to that construction site”; “now I will say how long you see your children”; etc. Gradually the children had started to ignore, act very reserved towards their mother or ran away when they see her in public.

The mother consults experts on the naked child pictures she had found and they described it as concerning. Downloading the pictures she found a recording made an hour before the pictures. In this, this father can be heard repeatedly saying, “penis-bum”, to the children. He was present. The mother made another police report.

About two months after this a social service worker, Leatitia Moreira, from school and Roland Meuller from the child education department (ONE) demand a meeting and tell the mother that she must “remember that she is mentally unstable and that her opinion on the pictures is irrelevant”. That the children, then about 5 to 8 years old, posing naked and in homo-sexualised positions on their father’s bed, is considered “normal development” in Luxembourg which the mother “must allow”.

This “domestic abuse victim” father “who fears for his life” moves to a house he bought 2 blocks away. The mother, having complained in court about Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde continuously frustrating home visitations, is moved back to the criminal institution for visitations with her children. Just being a whimsical the judge orders 50% less time for these visitations.

Irregardless of:
A testimony of this father’s friend who relays how this father also told him of being said to prefer little boys.
A testimony of the maternal grandmother who saw this father on a bed with his hand in the front of a sleeping 2 year old eldest boy’s nappy.
The grandmother’s doctor testifying that the grandmother was disturbed by his behaviour, which this man tried to convince her was “nothing”, and had discussed it with her doctor at the time.
A video depicting this father’s child penis groping/pinching public wrestling games.
The mother of the children testifying that the children told her that their father makes ‘food’ from his penis for them.
A voice recording in which this father can be heard repeating only “penis-bum” to small boys, followed by a session of children posing naked and sex media being produced on this father’s bed and in his bedroom.

The Youth/Family Court judge orders another psychiatric evaluation with a Dr Jacques Bernard. Dr Bernard stays within the chosen and decade long tendency…that what the mother fears is in Luxembourg simply labelled normal interaction between a father and his children, the mother is mentally unstable. If the mother agrees to this and is silent she can see her children normally, if not, then only supervised contact for her, he proposes to the court. The judge likes his report and refers to him as “he is an expert…”.

Someone needs to explain virtue to these mental “experts”.